Daily Column

DEAR DR. GOTT:
I am a 61-year-old male with no heart problems or recent surgeries. In June 2004 I developed a blood clot in my left lower leg which then resulted in a pulmonary embolus (clot) in my right lung. I was admitted to my local VA hospital and put on 5 mg Coumadin daily. My PT/INR was kept in the 2.0-3.0 range. I continued the medication until October 2006 when I was told I could stop it. All was well until February 2007 when I developed multiple pulmonary emboli in both lungs. This time I did not have any of the leg symptoms. I again went to the VA hospital where I was put on 5 mg of Coumadin every day. I was told that I would now have to take it for the rest of my life.

Because I did not understand why this was happening, I made an appointment with a hematologist (blood specialist). She took blood samples and did a genetic profile. Everything came back negative or normal. She concluded that I now have naturally “clotty” blood and I would have to live with it. There was no identifiable cause.

So now, Dr. Gott, my questions to you are: why, after 58 years of being a “normal blood clotter“, did the above happen to me? Will I really have to be on Coumadin for the rest of my life? Should the VA doctors be doing or have done more for me? Your opinions are appreciated.

DEAR READER:
I don’t know why your blood is now clotting in a dangerous fashion. Your hematologist appears to have run extensive tests and ruled out any genetic factors and disorders as the cause. Therefore, you will need to continue the Coumadin for the rest of life. If you were to discontinue it, you would run a very high risk of developing more pulmonary emboli (blood clots in the lungs). You would also be at higher risk for heart attack and stroke if the clots broke off and were carried to your heart or brain. Sticky blood is especially dangerous and your physicians have taken appropriate steps to normalize your blood and reduce your risk of serious consequences.

Another option to explore, albeit unlikely, is lung cancer. In my practice I have seen several cases where pulmonary emboli were the only symptoms of lung cancer. If you wish to explore this option, I recommend you see a pulmonologist (lung specialist). He or she will most likely take a medical history, do an examination and order some imaging studies of your lungs.

Let me know what happens.

To give you related information, I am sending you a copy of my Health Report “Pulmonary Disease”. Other readers who would like a copy should send a self-addressed, stamped number 10 envelope and $2 to Newsletter, PO Box 167, Wickliffe, OH 44092. Be sure to mention the title.

Daily Column

DEAR DR. GOTT:
I’m 73 years old and have been told by two doctors (after having two lung X-rays one month apart) that I have a small spot on my lung. The last doctor said it is probably scar tissue. I have never smoked, had pneumonia or any other disease or illness that might have caused this. The doctors just attribute it to age. The latest advice was to wait six months and have another X-ray to see if the spot has enlarged.

Can you shed any light on this? Do you think it’s advisable to wait six months or should I go to a pulmonary doctor?

DEAR READER:
I advise you not to wait. Were I in your shoes, I would opt to discover what the “spot” is now, not later.

You need to have proof that the “small spot” is benign and not an early lung cancer. In my opinion, you should be referred to a pulmonary specialist who may choose to obtain a CT scan or MRI possibly followed by a biopsy of the lesion. Depending on the outcome of the tests, the specialist can then advise whether treatment is necessary, and if so, can provide you with appropriate options.

While I may be over-reacting, I would hate to miss diagnosing an early lung malignancy that could be cured if addressed early in the course of the disease. Let me know how this turns out.

To give you related information, I am sending you copies of my Health Reports “Pulmonary Disease” and “Medical Specialists”. Other readers who would like copies should send a self-addressed, stamped number 10 envelope and $2 (per report) to Newsletter, PO Box 167, Wickliffe, OH 44092. Be sure to mention the title(s).

Daily Column

DEAR DR. GOTT:
What medical information is obtained from a blood gas? What symptoms indicate that a blood gas be performed on a patient?

DEAR READER:
An arterial blood gas measures the acidity as well as the amount of oxygen, carbon dioxide and other gases in the blood. The test is primarily used for evaluation of patients who are unable to breathe properly and maintain normal pulmonary functions. If the oxygen level is down and the carbon dioxide is elevated, aggressive therapy is required. This generally includes nebulizer treatments, supplemental oxygen, inhalers and more. It is also vital to find the cause of the breathing difficulties. Pulmonary disorders are one of the most common but heart failure, drug overdose, kidney failure or other severe stress disorders may also cause an abnormal blood gas level.

Patients who have serious lung disorders, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), often require supplemental oxygen 24 hours a day. A blood gas is important in this instance to ensure that the patient is responding appropriately and is receiving a proper amount of oxygen.

To give you related information, I am sending you a copy of my Health Report “Pulmonary Disease”. Other readers who would like a copy should send a long, self-addressed, stamped envelope and $2 to Newsletter, PO Box 167, Wickliffe, OH 44092. Be sure to mention the title.