Ask Dr. Gott » hoax http://askdrgottmd.com Ask Dr Gott MD's Website Sun, 12 Dec 2010 05:01:29 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Sunday Column http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column-38/ http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column-38/#comments Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:00:09 +0000 Dr. Gott http://askdrgottmd.dreamhosters.com/wp/?p=1473 DEAR DR. GOTT:
I am a 74-year-old male, in good health and not taking any medication. I am physically active and walk five miles a day. I am considering using cinnamon and honey but wonder if it is actually good for the body and if it has side effects.

According to information I found on the internet, cinnamon and honey is a cure for diseases of all kinds. I have included two of the paragraphs from the fact sheet.

“It is found that a mixture of honey and cinnamon cures most diseases. Honey is produced in most countries of the world. Scientists of today also accept honey as a ‘ram ban’ (very effective) medicine for all kinds of disease. Honey can be used without any side effects for any kind of disease. Today’s science says that even though honey is sweet, if taken in the right dosage as a medicine, it does not harm diabetic patients. Weekly World News, a magazine in Canada, on its issue dated Jan. 17, 1995 has given a large list of diseases that can be cured by honey and cinnamon as researched by western scientists.”

“Cholesterol: Two tablespoons of honey and three teaspoons of cinnamon powder mixed in 16 ounces of tea water, given to a cholesterol patient were found to reduce the level of cholesterol in the blood by 10% within two hours. If taken three times a day, any chronic cholesterol is cured. According to information in the said journal, pure honey taken with food daily relieves complaints of cholesterol. By the way, if you are taking cholesterol medicine, STOP! They all contain STATIN which weakens your muscles, including your heart and none has been shown to stop heart attacks or strokes!”

DEAR READER:
After some extensive research and confusion, I am able to answer your question. If you are a regular reader of my column, you may remember a couple of questions I answered about bottled water (frozen or left in a car) and plastic in the microwave. You may also remember that these were email or internet based, and were primarily over-exaggerated lies and half-truths; essentially, hoaxes. The article you have quoted is another one of these instances.

While researching the basis of this article I came across a few websites and articles that were nearly all identical. One of these websites even had an author who appears to have taken bits and pieces of the original and claimed it as her own. Shortly after finding that article, I discovered what appears to be the original online version on www.Snopes.com that started circulation sometime in 1995 which explains the date in the excerpt. It appears to have found a revival on several websites, forums and in spam emails.

This email and the original article that appeared in the Weekly World News (U.S. supermarket tabloid, similar to the National Enquirer, and includes headlines such as “Hilary Clinton Adopted Alien Baby” and “Fountain Of Vermouth Discovered”) claim that cinnamon and honey is a “ram ban” cure (a term I never heard in medical school) for everything from the common cold to cancer.

Like the water bottles and plastic in the microwave, there are some truths to the article but the vast majority contains unsupported claims. Both cinnamon and honey have some medical value. Cinnamon may help control diabetes and honey is good for healing wounds and soothing coughs. But claims that the two combined will cure cancer in one month, acne in two weeks and other disorders as well, is simply nonsense.

Now the claim that all cholesterol medicines contain statin is also false. Statin itself is not an ingredient, but rather a class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels. Many cholesterol medications are indeed statins and muscle weakness is a side effect, but certain brands, such as Lipitor, have proven to lower heart attack and stroke risk. I am also curious to know what complaints of cholesterol are. High cholesterol is a silent disease, causes no symptoms but can lead to plaque and artery build-up which can result in stroke and heart attack. A doctor would not be able to diagnose the condition without laboratory testing.

With all that being said, since you appear to be healthy, take no medications and are physically active, if you choose to drink a glass of tea (eight ounces) with honey and cinnamon once or twice a day, it will not harm you. It is simply a tasty drink. And remember, just because you read it online, doesn’t mean it’s true. Be sure to research the source of the claims and look for reliable websites from places such as Mayo Clinic or the National Institutes of Health for confirmation. Also, tell your doctor about all alternative remedies you are taking, regardless of how safe they may seem.

]]>
http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column-38/feed/ 0
Setting the record straight on lipstick http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column/ http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column/#comments Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:00:10 +0000 Dr. Gott http://askdrgottmd.dreamhosters.com/wp/?p=951 DEAR DR. GOTT: I recently received an email about lead in lipsticks. This was something I was not aware of and found it interesting. It is definitely something for women to consider the next time they go shopping for lipstick. I’ve shared it with all the women I know and men as well so they can inform all the women in their lives.

The email apparently originated from a physician in the breast cancer unit at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. This is how the email went:

“Recently a lipstick brand called “Red Earth” decreased their prices from $67.00 to $9.90. It contained lead. Lead is a chemical that can cause cancer. The higher the lead content, the greater the chance of causing cancer.

Some of the lipstick brands that contain lead are Christian Dior, Lancôme, Clinique, Y.S.L., Estee Lauder, Shiseido, Red Earth (Lip Gloss), Chanel (Lip Conditioner) and Market America-Motnes Lipstick.

After doing a test on these lipsticks, it was found that Y.S.L. contained the highest amount of led. Watch out for lipsticks that are supposed to stay longer. If your lipstick stays longer, it is because of the high content of lead.

There is a simple test you can do at home. First put some lipstick on your hand. Then use a gold ring to scratch it. If the lipstick color changes to black, it contains lead.”

DEAR READER: I have done some minimal research regarding this matter and have found that this information is misleading. It is true that The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (CSC) conducted a study in 2007 when it purchased 33 brands of lipsticks in 4 cities and tested them. They claim that more than half tested positive for lead. Because the FDA does not set restrictions on lead content in lipstick they used the maximum allowable level for candy (0.1%) as a guideline. Some lipsticks were found to have a level of 2 to 6 times higher (0.2 to 0.65%).

It appears the originator of this newest email hoax is taking various information from several sources such as the CSC and even other fake email warnings in an attempt at credibility.

There are several versions of this email being circulated. The most common version claims to be from Walter Reed Army Medical Center and mentions dioxin carcinogens (which was in a previous false email regarding water and plastic bottles). There is no mention of this warning on the Walter Reed website.

The test that is given in the email is also false. There are several materials that will turn black when a gold ring (and several other metals) are scratched through them, including plain wax. This means a “positive” test result is ultimately unreliable because the main ingredient in lipstick is wax.

The most glaring mistake in the email was the lack of attention to the potential hazards lead can cause. Long term exposure to lead can cause cancer. However, lead is dangerous in several other ways, including kidney disease, stroke and developmental issues in children. Short term exposure can also have potentially dangerous consequences. Had this email been from a legitimate medical source, cancer would not have been the main focus.

Several of the lipstick manufacturers that responded to claims of lead in their lipsticks claim that lead is not a component and that the positive results are most likely due to the natural exposure to lead that occurs every day from a variety of sources.

I believe the only potential danger from this is the dual exposure from natural sources and the lipstick accumulating over time. This is enhanced in children and pregnant women.

If you would like to know more on the lead in lipstick study, I recommend you visit The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics website (www.safecosmetics.org). For more information on the falsehoods of the email and more, I recommend you visit New Zealand’s Cosmetic Toiletry, Fragrances Association website (www.ctfa.org.nz).

]]>
http://askdrgottmd.com/sunday-column/feed/ 0